Thursday, 30 July 2009
Balance Acts
A Paradoxical Fan
Later I laughed at myself. I let the party get to me. What does that mean? It means that they have a democratic justification. With varying polls showing that 12-17 percent of Danish voters support them. The party keeps the democracy alive and kicking. They make people think and form their opinions. They fuel debate. In short, they work. With party leader Pia Kjærsgaard never failing to tune into the feelings and frame of mind of the party's electorate with close to a hundred percent precision. Never failing to cover the base perfectly. Isn't that what democracy is all about? And imagine getting anoyed with this adorable iron lady who gets away with practically anything in politics? I'd rather interview her, as a very unlikely fan.
For a more elaborate overview of the Danish political scene, please see:
A Modern Pretorian Guard
One of these companies, beginning and ending with a letter and a figure interfixed, has grown out of absolutely nothing for the past eight years through acquisitions. I even saw them at the municipality job centre. Three man tall sitting lazily around reading newspapers the entire day - when not doing an hourly round to watch over the job seekers at the computers. Or filling paper into the printers. Three man tall, full time, doing the job of a part time page girl. The paradox is: there are never any incidents to justify their presence (one such could of course be staged to justify the need for them). And I'm sure that they could be called - or rightly so, the police - if needed. Imagine the amount of tax dollars that go into these guards reading newspapers the entire day.
I say, with this constant eye in the sky - why don't we join in the game? Have some fun with this East block method. Let's start watching these guards closely. Just a taste of their own methods. Little Brother style.
Sunday, 26 July 2009
Meta-Comment No. 9
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
Homophobic Paradox
Watch and decide for yourself:
Sunday, 5 July 2009
Walter Russell Mead in Town
Where he also gave an interview. One of the points was that an American president had more or less four strings to play in exercising American foreign policy:
- The Hamiltonian - Goal: to develop world trade and commercialize countries
- Based on Alexander Hamilton. The initiator of the American Constitution under first US president George Washington.
- The Wilsonian - Goal: to change the world and to develop democracies worldwide
- Based on Woodrow Wilson. US president 1913-21 and initiator of the UN forerunner, Leage of Nations.
- The Jeffersonian - Goal: to ignore the world and to ensure freedom/security at home
- Based on Thomas Jefferson. The architect behind the Declaration of Independence and third US president.
- The Jacksonian - Goal: to protect American interests by force if necessary
- Based on Andrew Jackson. Seventh US president, American General who drove native Americans to the West.
"Obama's approaches in foreign policy are deeply rooted in these four schools. If you read his speeches with these four schools in mind, you'll find that he is something of a violinist. And although he seems to hit the Jacksonian string less - he does hit it," Walter Russell Mead claims.
His point being that any given president will change his role during a presidency, based on circumstances. From the universally open role to the realistic-cynical role when the United States is threatened. Even Obama, if faced with threats to mainland USA or the Americans.
"Suppose the Iranians respond to his ouvertures and it all goes very nicely, we would get one kind of approach. But if they keep testing missils and get closer to a bomb, we could see another approach. And it's interesting that every time he's asked, Obama says, 'I don't take options off the table'. Unlike Bush, he doesn't go around saying it all the time, but if you ask him, that is what he will tell you," Mead stresses. Paradox: Different package - same contents.