Sunday, 30 May 2010
Meta-Comment No. 23
Friday, 28 May 2010
Bond News
Ask and Tell
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Sports, Media - and Security Threats
According to Jakob Scharf, Director General of PET/Danish Security and Ingelligence Service, there is a general terror threat which is hightened during the World Cup this summer. And according to Danish daily Politiken, islamists linked to al-Quaeda had planned to make attacks on the Danish football (soccer) team during the World Cup in South Africa next month. With reference to the much publicized Danish cartoons in Jyllands-Posten. The specifics of that piece of information cannot be revealed and confirmed by PET:
'PET does not comment on concrete threats' - but 'The massive media attention during the World Cup in soccer could make the event an attractive target and draw militant islamists outside of South Africa. Therefore it is no surprise that, since April 2010, there have been several statements on militant islamist web pages, that encourage to an attack at the World Cup event an the participating countries. The re-printing of the Muhammed cartoons in February 2008 has led to an intensified focus on Denmark an Danish interests as a target for terror among leading militant islamists abroad,' Director General Jakob Scharf of PET states in a press release.
Bearing in mind the Munich massacre during the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, Germany, when members of the Israeli Olympic team were taken hostage and murdered by members of Black September, a militant islamist group under Fatah. The event itself - the media debate afterwards concluded - was thought to be realized due to the huge media attention of major sports events, that are broadcasted worldwide. Sadly effective because it gives air time to the plotters. Paradoxically, sports, media and security issues are closely linked.
For further information, please see:
Lib-Dem Reform Draft for UK
For further information, please see:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/05/19/uk.political.reform/index.html?hpt=T2
Monday, 17 May 2010
The Battle of Red And Yellow
The new government led by Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva was installed on September 19 2006 after a bloodless coup, supported by the Thai military. His supporters are known as 'Yellow Shirts'. They are highly educated, Royal supporters, and mainly come from major Thai cities. The battle of Red and Yellow has gone on since 2008. The government refuses to engage in talks with the 'Red Shirts' before they leave their Bangkok camps.
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Meta-Comment No. 22
Be that a business swindler trying to pitch something to you, and you simply feel that the pitch is too good to be true. Like the developing story in the Danish media about a certain Stein Bagger business swindler for instance. Based on the simplistic success model of 'fake it until you make it'. Or a news rumour put forward by news spreaders on the journalistic market - also too good to be true - and just sounds off somehow. Or your average street vendor trying to pitch a fake designer bag or pair of sunglasses to you.
I recently came back from Barcelona, and I met a Senegalese street vendor along the habour eagerly pitching fake copies of designer sunglasses. And I smalltalked with him, wondering why people readily buy the stuff. 'It's cheap,' was his logic response. In my logic response, 'Too cheap to be true' - and my very reason for not buying the stuff.
Paradoxical News has pitched many stories from the news rumour market - but has done so knowingly in the appropriate medium, where the not-so-real stuff gets a space. I have played along, for long now. And have done so with the tongue-in-cheek approach, naming the medium accordingly. Although the process is getting a little tiresome compared to the real stuff. Is it my age and experience that blocks me from buying the fake stuff, I wonder? However, there are very real stories in PN as well. This very segment for instance. And the first person singular 'I' stories carrying thoughts more than events and news stories.
What I mean to say is that I have an accute sense of the non-sensical and fake stuff. So I am not defect for not 'buying the stuff' that is fake. I am simply a journalist and a realist with my common sense about me. It's the pitch that is defect. So whether it be to Stein Bagger, to the 'off' news rumour pitchers, or to the fake goods street vendors - I would like to yell at the top of my lungs: 'Look, I don't buy the stuff, because it is fake. Would you give it a rest?' Or come back, when you have the genuine article.
The Next Labour Man
According to The Observer (The Guardian's weekend edition), David Miliband sees the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition as a natural result of political stagnation (although in PN words). People simply wanted change on the British political scene. So he's in the running to become the next Labour leader with time for preparation and elaboration of this Next Labour strategy. He will be running against his younger brother, Ed Miliband, who was the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change under Gordon Brown. And against Ed Balls, Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families under Brown, among others.
Still, David Miliband seems to be the most profiled of the candidates for the leader post in Labour. Not a 'people embracer' like Tony Blair, but probably with a more statesman-like appearance than several of his contesters. He doesn't see it as a problem that he will be up against his own brother, Ed Miliband - rather he welcomes the challenge. He would also respect and enjoy working under his leadership. David Miliband holds degrees in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from Oxford and in Political Science from MIT. Ed Miliband also holds a bachelor degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from Oxford, and a M.Sc. degree in Economics from the London School of Economics.
For a little fun, and very British, join the betting at smarkets.com in the link below. In writing this segment, David Miliband stod at around 57-64 percent odds of winning the race, followed by his brother Ed at around 31-34 percent odds of winning. The gain would be small if you bet on either Miliband, with only a 17£ win on 10£ invested, compared to betting on Jack Straw (former Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice under Brown) or Peter Mandelson (former First Secretary of State and Secretary of State for Business, and one of the architects behind Blair's New Labour). Bettings on both these contesters will return 1.000£ on your 10£ bet. Although timesonline put the money on Mandelson, describing him as someone who gets better, the worse things get - and going from zero to hero, in an article from August 2009.
Saturday, 15 May 2010
The Gekko Is Back
In the most appropriate way, Paradoxical News has covered this story - not from Cannes - but from afar. For financial melt down reasons.
For further information, please see (photos googled from fortune magazine and imdb.com):
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Keeping Busy
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/12/nyregion/12newyorkers.html?hpw
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/kagan_elena/index.html?inline=nyt-per
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/13/AR2010051305305.html?wpisrc=nl_pmheadline&sid=ST2010051305412
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
Cool Coalition
During the Blair New Labour years in late 90'ies and 00's Britain was Cool Britannia. As of 12th May, Britain has its first realized coalition government since World War II. The Cool Coalition of PM David Cameron/Conservative and Deputy PM Nick Clegg/Liberal Democrat. See The Guardian's interactive overview of the entire cabinet below. Together with the BBC World Q&A overview of political plans for the new coalition government.
The new cabinet's first priority is reportedly to safeguard national security and national economy. One of the first steps is a suggested five percent cut in ministerial salaries, to be frozen for the next five years. Always a nice move to go in front if you are to demand cutbacks for your followers. Another priority is to rebrand the Department for Education - which Labour spent a decade from 1997 to 2007 rebranding from Department for Education and Skills (DfES) into Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) - or nicknamed Department for Curtains and Soft Furnishings by the Conservatives. The Liberal Democrats accused Labour of spending 2,6 million pounds in that decade on rebranding and reorganising 11 ministries.
As in any good marriage, another agreement between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats is to keep any differences internally. In practical terms, and with only a minority of five ministers at play, compared to a dominant majority of 19 Conservative ministers, that means that the Lib.Dems will have little chance to voice anything departing from the Conservative party line. Or as political commentator Polly Toynbee puts it in The Guardian:
"The Tories will trample the Lib Dems like a rhino"
Polly Toynbee
At present the marriage of convenience between Conservatives and Lib.Dems seems jolly and sweet, with primarily a reform of the electoral system and the European Union to make cracks in the new found love. But these are also the honeymoon days. Let's see how the realities of married life will work for this new Cool Coalition.
For further information, please see (photo googled, among others found at The Daily Telegraph):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8680407.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8675848.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/may/12/election-2010-new-cabinet
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/13/ministers-pay-cut-frozen
A New New Deal
'If you have 12 minutes, we have a solution' - The Social Democrats (A) and The Socialist People's Party (F) initiate their political and economic plan called Fair Solution put forward yesterday to ensure growth, employment, economic and financial stability in the years to come by public investments in job creation, building, health care, and green energy. A new new deal, as it were. The extra 12 minutes not only refers to the time spent on listening to the proposal on the web site, but more so it refers to an extra 12 minutes work time each day - or an hour a week - to ensure employment, revenues and financial basis for the Danish welfare society. The idea is to work our way out of the crisis rather than making cuts in public spending.
The proposal was relatively well received by supporting opposition parties of The Social Liberals (B), and The Red-Green Alliance (Ø), although the - reformers - Social Liberals criticised the reluctancy to touch the early retirement assurances, which would help reach the EU economic standards (the so-called convergence programme) of a maximum three percent budget deficit. They have their own solution to gain an extra 36 billion on the budget by 2015. And the red-greens found that certain groups of the Danish workforce already worked hard enough, and suggested gaining the proposed 14-15 billion Danish kroner extra by heavier taxation of the multinational companies.
The Social Democrat-Socialist People's Party propositition didn't go down well with the government parties of The Conservatives (C) and The Liberals (V) - but what propositition from a political opponent would? Economic experts were called upon to debate the proposal, from government supporters to opposition supporters. But economic calculations showed that the proposals from either side would help reach the EU standards almost with the same effect - if not one year earlier (2012) by the proposal put forward by the opposition. And then there are all the unknown factors that can be used to alter the statistics. A bit like selling rubber band by the yard, as an old cliché goes.
The Social Democrats and The Socialist People's Party will have to fight for their proposal. Although backed by the unions, varying polls show that people would like to pitch in one extra work hour a week - and that they don't want to - respectively. Again, a new new deal sold by the yard, just like rubber bands. The original New Deal was put forward and initiated in 1933 by Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt after the Great Depression in USA and comprised heavy public investments in building projects. It brought the US economy back on track within a three-year period. It was sold to the public under the slogan 'The only thing we have to fear is fear itself'. Apart from rubber bands, that is.
For further information, please see:
Sunday, 9 May 2010
Happy Mother's Day!
The Mies van der Rohe Pavilion
The Pavilion is an open construction, much like a theatre where there is always one open side - out of six possible surfaces. Here it is either the top/roof or one wall. On the open terrace naturally more than one side. And with a decoration that is both simplistic and opulent at the same time. With thick red velour curtains, travertine, green marble on one side - and simple metal structures, glass frames and white surfaces on the other.
Barcelona Revisited
Brits Abroad
Later in Barcelona, Spain - I met several other Brits in buses and in funiculars, who liked and normally voted Labour and Brown, but still wanted to see some change after 13 years of Labour rule. They would go for Nick Clegg, but hoping for a 'Hung Parliament' - or coalition government. Which currently appears to be the solution, no matter who ends up with whom.
The Pub Crawl Electorate
I met several representatives of the British electorate, among them Marc and John. Small entrepreneurs, opinionated, although a bit tired of British politics - and with several pints to back up their opinions. They were tired of Brown and Labour for participating in wars abroad, for introducing widespread surveillance, for talking change without action - and for sitting too long in power. They simply wanted change. One normally for Conservatives, one for Liberal Democrats. But although both had hesitations towards the European Union (very British), both also supported Lib.Dems and Nick Clegg simply to see some change in British politics.
Mind you, this area of West London appeared to be more Conservative, more so than Labour-minded, in general - with journalists from the right wing The Daily Telegraph among the pub crawlers. Most predicted a 'Hung Parliament', with no candidate pooling enough seats in the Parliament to form a majority government. And lo and behold, we now see a situation after the election much like the Pub Crawl Electorate predicted.