We need more employees!, is an often repeated remark from politicians and economic experts. And several surveys in the renowned Danish weekly letter, Ugebrevet Mandag Morgen, for professionals, politicians, and the media - have pointed out that the need for employees is 'knowledge people' (i.e. people with higher education) - now and in the future. To meet the tough demands and the heavy international competition in the age of Globalization. Simply to create growth for our much loved Danish welfare society.
But there's a paradox in there. Between the conducted employment policy - and the actual need. When I attended so-called 'activation projects' for the unemployed (yes, we have those, even though we need them) some time last year, there was one thing that struck me. Hard. I was surrounded by people with higher forms of education - from engineers, IT-people, web-people, people with economic degrees, over communication people, to market people, journalists, and language people. You say Globalization? The really baffling paradox is that these are the people we need. And none of us could get a job in our current areas of expertise.
All of these people had the best of both worlds: higher educations (masters, Ph.d's and what have you) and had worked all their lives alongside. I tried very hard to spot the reasons for these people going unemployed at the same time as all the experts scream for their help in different jobs: were they in some way unwanted, annoying, unpleasant? Nope. Apart from being highly competent in different areas, they were really nice, humorous, positive, energetic - and truly wonderful people. Out of jobs, no matter what they did to get one. I heard lots of very inventive stories of what they had done to get jobs. Wouldn't it be relevant to take these people seriously?
You see, at the same time the registration system for the unemployed offers jobs to these knowledge people like: waiter in a hot dog stand, newspaper boy, parking servant, bakery servant. Practically no serious business or public office will rely on this system. Simply because employer and employee can't find each other in an outdated system. What further struck me was that the job centres outsource the actual employment service to little newcomer firms where the 'job consultants', 'project managers' etc. in many cases came from a full life of no education - and full lives on welfare. I do think that also people who have spent their lives on welfare should have a chance. But maybe in a more appropriate area?
First: how are they supposed to have the knowledge to help others to academic jobs? Second: would it be more relevant for the educated unemployed people to take these types of positions? Third: why not entirely eliminate this middle man from 'activation projects' that lead absolutely nowhere? And have them working some of the jobs, the employers are screaming for. Eliminate the middle man. Eliminate an ineffective bubble that takes workforce away from the productive areas. If the employers are willing to eliminate some of their unrealistic demands - outside the point with respect to the job positions, maybe it will all fall into place. My paradoxical question is: how come non-experienced people on welfare are brought back in attractive jobs - while all the higher educated people with lots of work experience fill the unemployment statistics? Or are pushed to take jobs outside of their fully updated areas of expertise - or working a newspaper route? In this age of Globalization and global competition for knowledge. Just bewildered by the paradox.
But there's a paradox in there. Between the conducted employment policy - and the actual need. When I attended so-called 'activation projects' for the unemployed (yes, we have those, even though we need them) some time last year, there was one thing that struck me. Hard. I was surrounded by people with higher forms of education - from engineers, IT-people, web-people, people with economic degrees, over communication people, to market people, journalists, and language people. You say Globalization? The really baffling paradox is that these are the people we need. And none of us could get a job in our current areas of expertise.
All of these people had the best of both worlds: higher educations (masters, Ph.d's and what have you) and had worked all their lives alongside. I tried very hard to spot the reasons for these people going unemployed at the same time as all the experts scream for their help in different jobs: were they in some way unwanted, annoying, unpleasant? Nope. Apart from being highly competent in different areas, they were really nice, humorous, positive, energetic - and truly wonderful people. Out of jobs, no matter what they did to get one. I heard lots of very inventive stories of what they had done to get jobs. Wouldn't it be relevant to take these people seriously?
You see, at the same time the registration system for the unemployed offers jobs to these knowledge people like: waiter in a hot dog stand, newspaper boy, parking servant, bakery servant. Practically no serious business or public office will rely on this system. Simply because employer and employee can't find each other in an outdated system. What further struck me was that the job centres outsource the actual employment service to little newcomer firms where the 'job consultants', 'project managers' etc. in many cases came from a full life of no education - and full lives on welfare. I do think that also people who have spent their lives on welfare should have a chance. But maybe in a more appropriate area?
First: how are they supposed to have the knowledge to help others to academic jobs? Second: would it be more relevant for the educated unemployed people to take these types of positions? Third: why not entirely eliminate this middle man from 'activation projects' that lead absolutely nowhere? And have them working some of the jobs, the employers are screaming for. Eliminate the middle man. Eliminate an ineffective bubble that takes workforce away from the productive areas. If the employers are willing to eliminate some of their unrealistic demands - outside the point with respect to the job positions, maybe it will all fall into place. My paradoxical question is: how come non-experienced people on welfare are brought back in attractive jobs - while all the higher educated people with lots of work experience fill the unemployment statistics? Or are pushed to take jobs outside of their fully updated areas of expertise - or working a newspaper route? In this age of Globalization and global competition for knowledge. Just bewildered by the paradox.